[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFz9XdUP0BQXuq7UuZT1ke-+JVThs-bssMi2sV2xLubHVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:04:27 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: Rethinking sigcontext's xfeatures slightly for PKRU's benefit?
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
> IOW, I like my idea in which signal delivery always sets PKRU to the
> application-requested-by-syscall values and sigreturn restores it.
So I don't mind that, as long as the whole "sigreturn restores it" is
part of things.
Your original email with the suggestion to *not* resture PKRU I didn't
like. Setting it and restoring it is fine.
I do wonder if you need an explicit value, though. I think it's
reasonable to say that PKRU value 0 is special. It's what we'd start
processes with, and why not just say that it's what we run signal
handlers in?
Would any other value ever make sense, really?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists