[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5675A576.8020008@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 19:44:06 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...gotech.com>,
"James E. J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
James Smart <james.smart@...gotech.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] SCSI-lpfc: Use a signed return type for two functions
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 19:32:27 +0100
The return type "size_t" was used by the functions "lpfc_wwn_set"
and "lpfc_oas_lun_state_set" despite of the aspect that they will
eventually return a negative error code.
Improve this implementation detail by using the type "ssize_t" instead.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c
index f6446d7..777960e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c
@@ -2089,7 +2089,7 @@ static char *lpfc_soft_wwn_key = "C99G71SL8032A";
* -EINVAL if the buffer does not contain a valid wwn
* 0 success
**/
-static size_t
+static ssize_t
lpfc_wwn_set(const char *buf, size_t cnt, char wwn[])
{
unsigned int i, j;
@@ -2570,7 +2570,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(lpfc_xlane_lun_status, S_IRUGO,
* -EPERM OAS is not enabled or not supported by this port.
*
*/
-static size_t
+static ssize_t
lpfc_oas_lun_state_set(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint8_t vpt_wwpn[],
uint8_t tgt_wwpn[], uint64_t lun, uint32_t oas_state)
{
--
2.6.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists