linux-kernel - [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mce: Ensure offline CPUs don' t participate in rendezvous process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-d90167a941f62860f35eb960e1012aa2d30e7e94@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 19 Dec 2015 01:15:38 -0800
From:	tip-bot for Ashok Raj <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	ashok.raj@...el.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com,
	bp@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mce: Ensure offline CPUs don'
 t participate in rendezvous process

Commit-ID:  d90167a941f62860f35eb960e1012aa2d30e7e94
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/d90167a941f62860f35eb960e1012aa2d30e7e94
Author:     Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:12:26 +0100
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:55:31 +0100

x86/mce: Ensure offline CPUs don't participate in rendezvous process

Intel's MCA implementation broadcasts MCEs to all CPUs on the
node. This poses a problem for offlined CPUs which cannot
participate in the rendezvous process:

  Kernel panic - not syncing: Timeout: Not all CPUs entered broadcast exception handler
  Kernel Offset: disabled
  Rebooting in 100 seconds..

More specifically, Linux does a soft offline of a CPU when
writing a 0 to /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online, which
doesn't prevent the #MC exception from being broadcasted to that
CPU.

Ensure that offline CPUs don't participate in the MCE rendezvous
and clear the RIP valid status bit so that a second MCE won't
cause a shutdown.

Without the patch, mce_start() will increment mce_callin and
wait for all CPUs. Offlined CPUs should avoid participating in
the rendezvous process altogether.

Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
[ Massage commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449742346-21470-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index c5b0d56..7e8a736 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -999,6 +999,17 @@ void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 	int flags = MF_ACTION_REQUIRED;
 	int lmce = 0;
 
+	/* If this CPU is offline, just bail out. */
+	if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) {
+		u64 mcgstatus;
+
+		mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);
+		if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV) {
+			mce_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS, 0);
+			return;
+		}
+	}
+
 	ist_enter(regs);
 
 	this_cpu_inc(mce_exception_count);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/