lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 13:51:11 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix-clock: Use an unsigned data type for a variable On Sun, 20 Dec 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Reuse the type from this poll call instead. > > > > Why use uint when the function return type it unsigned int? > > Do you prefer to express the type modifier once more there? I don't know what the sentence means, but I think that the type should be referenced in a consistent manner. > > On the other hand, why is the function return type unsigned int > > when there is a return of a negative constant? > > This implementation detail can trigger further software development > considerations, can't it? It would seem reasonable to address all of the signed/unsigned issues related to the function return value at once. julia > This is a general issue for the exception handling in several functions. > Would you like to improve any more source code around it? > > Regards, > Markus > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists