[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1512201350100.2067@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 13:51:11 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix-clock: Use an unsigned data type for a variable
On Sun, 20 Dec 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Reuse the type from this poll call instead.
> >
> > Why use uint when the function return type it unsigned int?
>
> Do you prefer to express the type modifier once more there?
I don't know what the sentence means, but I think that the type should be
referenced in a consistent manner.
> > On the other hand, why is the function return type unsigned int
> > when there is a return of a negative constant?
>
> This implementation detail can trigger further software development
> considerations, can't it?
It would seem reasonable to address all of the signed/unsigned issues
related to the function return value at once.
julia
> This is a general issue for the exception handling in several functions.
> Would you like to improve any more source code around it?
>
> Regards,
> Markus
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists