lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1450650492-18996-3-git-send-email-v1ron@mail.ru>
Date:	Mon, 21 Dec 2015 01:28:10 +0300
From:	Roman Volkov <v1ron@...l.ru>
To:	Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>
Cc:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Roman Volkov <rvolkov@...os.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] clocksource/vt8500: Remove the 'loops' variable

From: Roman Volkov <rvolkov@...os.org>

The purpose of the 'loops' variable is unclear. vt8500 hardware does not
require any protections, in case if these variables intended for preventing
infinite loops (identical PXA timer works perfectly without these ones). If
the loops count will not be calculated correctly, these variables will only
break the loop too early and introduce problems.

Signed-off-by: Roman Volkov <rvolkov@...os.org>
---
 drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c
index 13ed892..f40ded8 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c
@@ -48,8 +48,6 @@
 #define TIMER_COUNT_W_ACTIVE	(1 << 4)	/* not ready for write */
 #define TIMER_MATCH_W_ACTIVE	(1 << 0)	/* not ready for write */
 
-#define msecs_to_loops(t) (loops_per_jiffy / 1000 * HZ * t)
-
 #define timer_readl(addr)	readl_relaxed(regbase + addr)
 #define timer_writel(v, addr)	writel_relaxed(v, regbase + addr)
 
@@ -57,10 +55,10 @@ static void __iomem *regbase;
 
 static cycle_t vt8500_timer_read(struct clocksource *cs)
 {
-	int loops = msecs_to_loops(10);
 	timer_writel(3, TIMER_CTRL_VAL);
-	while ((timer_readl((TIMER_AS_VAL)) & TIMER_COUNT_R_ACTIVE) && --loops)
+	while (timer_readl(TIMER_AS_VAL) & TIMER_COUNT_R_ACTIVE)
 		cpu_relax();
+
 	return timer_readl(TIMER_COUNT_VAL);
 }
 
@@ -75,9 +73,8 @@ static struct clocksource clocksource = {
 static int vt8500_timer_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles,
 				    struct clock_event_device *evt)
 {
-	int loops = msecs_to_loops(10);
 	cycle_t alarm = clocksource.read(&clocksource) + cycles;
-	while ((timer_readl(TIMER_AS_VAL) & TIMER_MATCH_W_ACTIVE) && --loops)
+	while (timer_readl(TIMER_AS_VAL) & TIMER_MATCH_W_ACTIVE)
 		cpu_relax();
 	timer_writel((unsigned long)alarm, TIMER_MATCH_VAL);
 
-- 
2.6.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ