[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1450590007.3296.6.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 06:40:07 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Bhuvanesh_Surachari@...tor.com, Andy Lowe <Andy_Lowe@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 5/5] futex: Cleanup the goto confusion in requeue_pi()
On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 21:15 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> As a follow-on, I think it might be worthwhile to create a symmetrical
> get_pi_state() to the put_pi_state(), rather than handling the atomic_inc
> directly.
Ditto, immediate thought was future auditors will look for it.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists