linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] thermal: rockchip: fix a impossible condition caused by the warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56765DB4.5070901@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 20 Dec 2015 15:50:12 +0800
From:	Caesar Wang <caesar.upstream@...il.com>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC:	Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	dianders@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, computersforpeace@...il.com,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] thermal: rockchip: fix a impossible condition
 caused by the warning



在 2015年12月04日 04:19, Dmitry Torokhov 写道:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:48:40PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>> As the Dan report the smatch check the thermal driver warning:
>> drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:551 rockchip_configure_from_dt()
>> warn: impossible condition '(thermal->tshut_temp > ((~0 >> 1))) =>
>> (s32min-s32max > s32max)'
>>
>> Let's we remove the imposssible condition Since the Temperature is
>> currently represented as int not long in the thermal driver.
>>
>> Fixes: commit 437df2172e8d
>> ("thermal: rockchip: consistently use int for temperatures")
>>
>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - As Brian comments on https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7580661/,
>>    let's remove the impossible condition.
>>
>> Changes in v2: None
>> Changes in v1: None
>>
>>   drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 6 ------
>>   1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> index ae796ec..611de00 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> @@ -549,12 +549,6 @@ static int rockchip_configure_from_dt(struct device *dev,
>>   		thermal->tshut_temp = shut_temp;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	if (thermal->tshut_temp > INT_MAX) {
>> -		dev_err(dev, "Invalid tshut temperature specified: %d\n",
>> -			thermal->tshut_temp);
>> -		return -ERANGE;
>> -	}
> Well, that is not entirely correct. The value that we read from DT is
> u32, but we convert it down to int. I believe you want to move the check
> up so that you do:
>
> 	} else if (tshut_temp > INT_MAX) {
> 		dev_err(dev, "Invalid tshut temperature specified: %d\n",
> 			thermal->tshut_temp);
> 		return -ERANGE;
> 	} else {
> 		thermal->tshut_temp = shut_temp;
> 	}

Okay,
that's seem the following wll be resonable since the checkcode is a warning.

if (of_property_read_u32(np, "rockchip,hw-tshut-temp", &shut_temp)) {
         dev_warn(dev,
              "Missing tshut temp property, using default %d\n",
              thermal->chip->tshut_temp);
         thermal->tshut_temp = thermal->chip->tshut_temp;
     } else {
         if (tshut_temp > INT_MAX) {
             dev_err(dev, "Invalid tshut temperature specified: %d\n",
                 tshut_temp);
             return -ERANGE;
         }
         thermal->tshut_temp = shut_temp;
     }

Thanks,


> Thanks.
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/