[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5677C526.5070803@digikod.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:23:50 +0100
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>,
Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@....org>,
Anton Ivanov <aivanov@...cade.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Meredydd Luff <meredydd@...atehouse.org>,
David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] um: Fix ptrace GETREGS/SETREGS bugs
On 21/12/2015 10:00, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> [sending the mail again, Thunderbird crashed :-\]
>
> Am 21.12.2015 um 09:49 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
>>
>> On 21/12/2015 01:20, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Am 21.12.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Mickaël Salaün:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
>>>> index 1683b8e..65f0d1a 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
>>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>>> #include <linux/ptrace.h>
>>>> #include <kern_util.h>
>>>> #include <sysdep/ptrace.h>
>>>> +#include <sysdep/ptrace_user.h>
>>>> #include <sysdep/syscalls.h>
>>>> #include <os.h>
>>>>
>>>> @@ -16,12 +17,16 @@ void handle_syscall(struct uml_pt_regs *r)
>>>> long result;
>>>> int syscall;
>>>>
>>>> + /* Save the syscall register. */
>>>> + UPT_SYSCALL_NR(r) = PT_SYSCALL_NR(r->gp);
>>>> +
>>>> if (syscall_trace_enter(regs)) {
>>>> result = -ENOSYS;
>>>> goto out;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - syscall = get_syscall(r);
>>>> + /* Get the syscall after being potentially updated with ptrace. */
>>>> + syscall = UPT_SYSCALL_NR(r);
>>>
>>> Doesn't this break the support for changing syscall numbers using PTRACE_SETREGS?
>>
>> The logic is unchanged except updating the UPT_SYSCALL_NR before syscall_trace_enter(). I did my last tests with the x86_32 subarchitecture and all tests (from selftest/seccomp), including PTRACE_SETREGS for syscall numbers tests, passed. However, 2 of this tests still fail for x86_64 (only).
>
> No, the logic is different.
> syscall_trace_enter(regs) enters the ptrace() path and here registers can be changed.
> Hence "syscall = UPT_SYSCALL_NR(r);" will see the old syscall number.
> UPT_SYSCALL_NR() returns the syscall number before the ptrace() path...
The thing is, PTRACE_SETREGS give access to *orig_ax* in the user_regs_struct from arch/x86/include/asm/user_*.h and selftest/seccomp only update this (virtual) register, not the EAX/RAX. Am I missing something?
Mickaël
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (456 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists