[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151221140104.GQ23092@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:01:04 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: guohanjun@...wei.com, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pi3orama <pi3orama@....com>,
xiakaixu 00238161 <xiakaixu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT]: ARM64: perf: System hung in perf test
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:56:03PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> System hung can be reproduced on qemu and real hardware using:
>
> # perf test -v signal
>
> If qemu is started with '-smp 1', system hung. In real hardware and in
> qemu with smp > 1, the result is:
That sounds like a qemu issue...
> # /perf test -v signal
> 17: Test breakpoint overflow signal handler :
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 792
> count1 11, count2 11, overflow 11
> failed: RF EFLAG recursion issue detected
> failed: wrong overflow hit
> failed: wrong count for bp2
> test child finished with -1
> ---- end ----
> Test breakpoint overflow signal handler: FAILED!
... and this sounds like the perf tool expecting to single-step over
signal handlers, whereas (on arm64) we deliberately single-step into
them, so you can run into a loop for this case.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists