[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5678205B.1090905@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 07:52:59 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
Cc: wim@...ana.be, dyoung@...hat.com, dzickus@...hat.com,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/2] watchdog: Use static struct class watchdog_class
in stead of pointer
On 12/18/2015 08:22 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> On 17/12/2015:06:56:27 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 12/17/2015 04:23 AM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>>> We need few sysfs attributes to know different status of a watchdog device.
>>> To do that, we need to associate .dev_groups with watchdog_class. So
>>> convert it from pointer to static.
>>> Putting this static struct in watchdog_dev.c, so that static device
>>> attributes defined in that file can be attached to it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
>>> Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>
>> As things evolve, I'd by now prefer to move the call to device_create()
>> into watchdog_dev.c, but that can wait for a follow-up patch if Wim
>> is ok with this series.
>
> Thanks for your quick review.
>
> OK. I will wait for Wim's comment and then may be I will send another
> version with your comment for patch 1/1 incorporated.
>
Thinking about it, my comment is really minor and should not hold up the
series from going forward. So let's just skip another version unless Wim
or someone else has any comments.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists