| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:41:17 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Julian Margetson <runaway@...dw.ms>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: remove incorrect locking
On Mon, 2015-12-21 at 18:17 +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> This lock is already taken in ata_scsi_queuecmd() a few levels up the
> call stack so attempting to take it here is an error. Moreover, it
> is
> pointless in the first place since it only protects a single, atomic
> assignment.
>
> Enabling lock debugging gives the following output:
>
+Julian.
I think Julian may give his Tested-by: tag.
> =============================================
> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> 4.4.0-rc5+ #189 Not tainted
> ---------------------------------------------
> kworker/u2:3/37 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&(&host->lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<90283294>]
> sata_dwc_exec_command_by_tag.constprop.14+0x44/0x8c
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&(&host->lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<902761ac>]
> ata_scsi_queuecmd+0x2c/0x330
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0
> ----
> lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock);
> lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
> May be due to missing lock nesting notation
>
> 4 locks held by kworker/u2:3/37:
> #0: ("events_unbound"){.+.+.+}, at: [<9003a0a4>]
> process_one_work+0x12c/0x430
> #1: ((&entry->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<9003a0a4>]
> process_one_work+0x12c/0x430
> #2: (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<9011fd54>]
> __blkdev_get+0x50/0x380
> #3: (&(&host->lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<902761ac>]
> ata_scsi_queuecmd+0x2c/0x330
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 PID: 37 Comm: kworker/u2:3 Not tainted 4.4.0-rc5+ #189
> Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> Stack : 90b38e30 00000021 00000003 9b2a6040 00000000 9005f3f0
> 904fc8dc 00000025
> 906b96e4 00000000 90528648 9b3336c4 904fc8dc 9009bf18
> 00000002 00000004
> 00000000 00000000 9b3336c4 9b3336e4 904fc8dc 9003d074
> 00000000 90500000
> 9005e738 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> 00000000 00000000
> 6e657665 755f7374 756f626e 0000646e 00000000 00000000
> 9b00ca00 9b025000
> ...
> Call Trace:
> [<90009d6c>] show_stack+0x88/0xa4
> [<90057744>] __lock_acquire+0x1ce8/0x2154
> [<900583e4>] lock_acquire+0x64/0x8c
> [<9045ff10>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x54/0x78
> [<90283294>] sata_dwc_exec_command_by_tag.constprop.14+0x44/0x8c
> [<90283484>] sata_dwc_qc_issue+0x1a8/0x24c
> [<9026b39c>] ata_qc_issue+0x1f0/0x410
> [<90273c6c>] ata_scsi_translate+0xb4/0x200
> [<90276234>] ata_scsi_queuecmd+0xb4/0x330
> [<9025800c>] scsi_dispatch_cmd+0xd0/0x128
> [<90259934>] scsi_request_fn+0x58c/0x638
> [<901a3e50>] __blk_run_queue+0x40/0x5c
> [<901a83d4>] blk_queue_bio+0x27c/0x28c
> [<901a5914>] generic_make_request+0xf0/0x188
> [<901a5a54>] submit_bio+0xa8/0x194
> [<9011adcc>] submit_bh_wbc.isra.23+0x15c/0x17c
> [<9011c908>] block_read_full_page+0x3e4/0x428
> [<9009e2e0>] do_read_cache_page+0xac/0x210
> [<9009fd90>] read_cache_page+0x18/0x24
> [<901bbd18>] read_dev_sector+0x38/0xb0
> [<901bd174>] msdos_partition+0xb4/0x5c0
> [<901bcb8c>] check_partition+0x140/0x274
> [<901bba60>] rescan_partitions+0xa0/0x2b0
> [<9011ff68>] __blkdev_get+0x264/0x380
> [<901201ac>] blkdev_get+0x128/0x36c
> [<901b9378>] add_disk+0x3c0/0x4bc
> [<90268268>] sd_probe_async+0x100/0x224
> [<90043a44>] async_run_entry_fn+0x50/0x124
> [<9003a11c>] process_one_work+0x1a4/0x430
> [<9003a4f4>] worker_thread+0x14c/0x4fc
> [<900408f4>] kthread+0xd0/0xe8
> [<90004338>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
>
> Fixes: 62936009f35a ("[libata] Add 460EX on-chip SATA driver,
> sata_dwc_460ex")
> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>
> ---
> drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
> b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
> index 902034991517..7a7faca0ddcd 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
> @@ -924,15 +924,13 @@ static void sata_dwc_exec_command_by_tag(struct
> ata_port *ap,
> struct ata_taskfile *tf,
> u8 tag, u32 cmd_issued)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> struct sata_dwc_device_port *hsdevp = HSDEVP_FROM_AP(ap);
>
> dev_dbg(ap->dev, "%s cmd(0x%02x): %s tag=%d\n", __func__,
> tf->command,
> ata_get_cmd_descript(tf->command), tag);
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&ap->host->lock, flags);
> hsdevp->cmd_issued[tag] = cmd_issued;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ap->host->lock, flags);
> +
> /*
> * Clear SError before executing a new command.
> * sata_dwc_scr_write and read can not be used here.
> Clearing the PM
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists