lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:29:21 -0800
From:	Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>
To:	Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>,
	Tadeusz Struk <tstruk@...il.com>
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	marcel@...tmann.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dhowells@...hat.com, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: AF_ALG - add support for keys/asymmetric-type

Hi Stephan,
On 12/21/2015 01:27 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>> @@ -192,7 +194,30 @@ static int alg_setkey(struct sock *sk, char __user
>> > *ukey, if (copy_from_user(key, ukey, keylen))
>> >  		goto out;
>> > 
>> > -	err = setkey(ask->private, key, keylen);
>> > +	if (key_id) {
> Wouldn't it make sense to rather have a complete separate function for setting 
> the key based on the ID? I.e. we have one function for setting the key based 
> on a user-given buffer. A second function handles your additional code. As 
> both are unrelated, I would not suggest to clutter one function with the logic 
> of the other.

Either way is fine with me. I just didn't want to have too many indentation
levels in the alg_setsockopt function.

> 
>> -		err = alg_setkey(sk, optval, optlen, type->setkey);
>> > +		/* ALG_SET_KEY_ID is only for akcipher */
>> > +		if (!strcmp(type->name, "akcipher") && key_id)
> Why do you want to limit it to akcipher? I would think it can apply to all 
> types of keys. You mention that you want to restrict it to akcipher, but where 
> do you see the limitation for HMAC / skcipher?
> 
I pass key_type_asymmetric to request_key(), which only works with asymmetric.
To enable symmetric we would need to have a new key type, which would handle
both. 
Thanks,
-- 
TS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ