[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZWXnR0tUbr9KeX3KPEe11pUYC5ZcBkX8jvUx3fREwHgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:25:06 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add support for monitoring gpio switches
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Martyn Welch
<martyn.welch@...labora.co.uk> wrote:
>> Patches like that has however already been suggested, and I have NACKed
>> them because the GPIO sysfs ABI is insane, and that is why I am
>> refactoring
>> the world to create a proper chardev ABI for GPIO instead. See:
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-gpio&m=144550276512673&w=2
>
> I can certainly understand the rationale for the changes that you are
> proposing, though do worry that it does make it a bit tougher to use from
> scripting languages.
The idea is to provide commandline tools in the kernel tools/gpio subdir
to satisfy the needs of scripting. "lsgpio" today is just one example,
nothing stops us from having a tool called just "gpio-sak"
(GPIO swiss army knife) that will be tailored for scripting.
> I see that the question of how to provide functionality
> equivalent to the above was raised and no answer was forthcoming. Is there a
> plan for supporting the identification of a GPIO line serving a specific
> purpose?
Yes by name.
> What is the status of the mentioned patch series?
They stubled into a few dozen architecture issues in the GPIO
subsystem so I am busy refactoring the whole know universe :D
But I still intend to persue the series.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists