[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5678999C.7040808@mleia.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 02:30:20 +0200
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
To: Cory Tusar <cory.tusar@...1solutions.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
CC: jic23@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org, afd@...com, andrew@...n.ch,
Chris.Healy@....aero, Keith.Vennel@....aero,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] misc: eeprom_93xx46: Add support for a GPIO 'select'
line.
Hi Cory,
On 10.12.2015 06:00, Cory Tusar wrote:
> This commit adds support to the eeprom_93x46 driver allowing a GPIO line
> to function as a 'select' or 'enable' signal prior to accessing the
> EEPROM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cory Tusar <cory.tusar@...1solutions.com>
> Tested-by: Chris Healy <chris.healy@....aero>
> ---
> drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93xx46.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/eeprom_93xx46.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93xx46.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93xx46.c
> index d50bc17..d28fac2 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93xx46.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93xx46.c
> @@ -10,11 +10,13 @@
>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> @@ -343,6 +345,20 @@ static ssize_t eeprom_93xx46_store_erase(struct device *dev,
> }
> static DEVICE_ATTR(erase, S_IWUSR, NULL, eeprom_93xx46_store_erase);
>
> +static void select_assert(void *context)
> +{
> + struct eeprom_93xx46_dev *edev = context;
> +
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(edev->pdata->select, 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void select_deassert(void *context)
> +{
> + struct eeprom_93xx46_dev *edev = context;
> +
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(edev->pdata->select, 0);
> +}
> +
> static const struct of_device_id eeprom_93xx46_of_table[] = {
> { .compatible = "eeprom-93xx46", },
> { .compatible = "atmel,at93c46d", .data = &atmel_at93c46d_data, },
> @@ -357,6 +373,8 @@ static int eeprom_93xx46_probe_dt(struct spi_device *spi)
> struct device_node *np = spi->dev.of_node;
> struct eeprom_93xx46_platform_data *pd;
> u32 tmp;
> + int gpio;
> + enum of_gpio_flags of_flags;
> int ret;
>
> pd = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*pd), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -381,6 +399,23 @@ static int eeprom_93xx46_probe_dt(struct spi_device *spi)
> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "read-only"))
> pd->flags |= EE_READONLY;
>
> + gpio = of_get_named_gpio_flags(np, "select-gpios", 0, &of_flags);
> + if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
> + unsigned long flags =
> + of_flags == OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW ? GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW : 0;
> +
> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&spi->dev, gpio, flags,
> + "eeprom_93xx46_select");
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + pd->select = gpio_to_desc(gpio);
> + pd->prepare = select_assert;
> + pd->finish = select_deassert;
> +
> + gpiod_direction_output(pd->select, 0);
> + }
> +
> if (of_id->data) {
> const struct eeprom_93xx46_devtype_data *data = of_id->data;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/eeprom_93xx46.h b/include/linux/eeprom_93xx46.h
> index 92fa4c3..03f3435 100644
> --- a/include/linux/eeprom_93xx46.h
> +++ b/include/linux/eeprom_93xx46.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
> * platform description for 93xx46 EEPROMs.
> */
>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> +
You need just "struct gpio_desc;" instead of the include here, please fix.
> struct eeprom_93xx46_platform_data {
> unsigned char flags;
> #define EE_ADDR8 0x01 /* 8 bit addr. cfg */
> @@ -21,4 +23,5 @@ struct eeprom_93xx46_platform_data {
> */
> void (*prepare)(void *);
> void (*finish)(void *);
> + struct gpio_desc *select;
> };
>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists