linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: generic: Refactor code to enable reuse by other drivers.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:29:31 -0800
From:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC:	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: generic: Refactor code to enable reuse by other
 drivers.

On 12/22/2015 02:07 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:53:41PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
>> From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>>
>> No change in functionality.
>>
>> Move structure definitions into a separate header file.  Split probe
>> function in to two parts:
>>
>>     - a small driver specific probe function (gen_pci_probe)
>>
>>     - a common probe that can be used by other drivers
>>       (gen_pci_common_probe)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c | 53 ++++++++++++-----------------------
>>   drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.h | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
>> index 5434c90..e83cec7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c
[...]
>> -static int gen_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +int gen_pci_common_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> +			 struct gen_pci *pci)
>
> Whilst I'm fine with this patch, I don't know how Bjorn will feel about
> exposing this function outside of the generic host driver. We could avoid
> it by turning things upside-down and having the generic driver probe
> the other drivers by matching a compatible string with a probe function
> pointer, but I'd be interested to see what others think.
>

Note: I know that pci-host-generic is not built as a loadable module, but...

struct of_device_id, MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE, struct platform_driver and the 
registering of platform drivers is fairly well standardized in the 
kernel, and module loading userpace tools.

The struct of_device_id, MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE must really reside in the 
same module as the driver for the device.   We are creating a separate 
driver precisely because we don't want to mix all this ThunderX specific 
code into the pci-host-generic driver when it is used by arm-32bit and 
others.  This means that, at a minimum, we would have to export the 
pci-host-generic probe function so that it could be referenced by struct 
platform_driver in other modules.

This brings up the next problem.  How to attach driver specific data to 
the generic driver structures?  At first I tried augmenting  struct 
gen_pci_cfg_bus_ops with a callback .init() function to be called by the 
generic driver, but this would also require adding an an element to 
struct gen_pci to point to a driver specific data object.  It felt a 
little convoluted and complex.

This led me to the current design where struct gen_pci is embedded in 
the driver specific structure, and the allocation of this is done in the 
driver specific probe function.  No more callbacks, no additions to the 
pci-host-generic structures.  I think it is a little cleaner this way.

If there are suggestions as to how it can be made cleaner yet, I would 
be happy to implement and test them.

David Daney

> Will
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/