[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151222151527.b4fd06da45d5c86d193c773d@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 15:15:27 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: memcontrol: reign in the CONFIG space madness
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 15:11:38 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> What I have is
And after a bit of reject resolution in
mm-memcontrol-clean-up-alloc-online-offline-free-functions.patch we
have
static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
{
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css);
if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && !cgroup_memory_nosocket)
static_branch_dec(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
vmpressure_cleanup(&memcg->vmpressure);
cancel_work_sync(&memcg->high_work);
mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees(memcg);
memcg_free_kmem(memcg);
if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && memcg->tcpmem_active)
static_branch_dec(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
mem_cgroup_free(memcg);
}
code looks a bit strange. Can we move the static_branch_dec's together
and run cgroup_subsys_on_dfl just once?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists