[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151222234925.GB16023@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 23:49:25 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Songjun Wu <songjun.wu@...el.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: DT binding for PDMIC
driver
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:37:24PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> >> "label" can be used here if this is really needed.
> > The plastics for the system are often very important for audio
> > configuration - we need userspace to be able to distinguish between
> > systems that are identical even on the electrical level.
> Okay. That is exactly what label is for, so please use it.
Can you send fixes for this please? There's rather a lot of existing
bindings using the current scheme, together with some subsystem code to
help parse them.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists