linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <567A9079.9030400@samsung.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2015 21:15:53 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@...sung.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	k.kozlowski.k@...il.com, 'Mark Rutland' <mark.rutland@....com>,
	'Pawel Moll' <pawel.moll@....com>,
	'Ian Campbell' <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	'Rob Herring' <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	'Kukjin Kim' <kgene@...nel.org>,
	'Kumar Gala' <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support
 for SMDK5410

W dniu 18.12.2015 o 18:16, Pavel Fedin pisze:
>  Hello!
> 
>> 4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my
>> previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so
>> depending on the timing of {arm-soc,Christmas,Kukjin} this may or may
>> not go into v4.5 (yay...).
>>
>> 5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further
>> for v4.6.
>>
>> If you have any questions, please let me know.
> 
>  Thank you very much. No, i don't have any questions, i'm glad that my work is picked up and not lost, i'm just keeping an eye on it
> until it goes to stable.
> 
>  P.S. Not related to these sets directly, just to note... When i was writing the doc for SROMc bindings, i noticed that we have two
> directories for Exynos in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm:
> 1. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos
> 2. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/Samsung
> 
>  In (1) we have only a single old file, shouldn't this be cleaned up and shouldn't this file be moved to (2)?

Thanks for hind but I already cleaned it up:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=068812ed108acbfe070b893faba9845fe2ea3fd9

Best regards,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/