[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1450955268.15911.85.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 14:07:48 +0300
From: Sergei Ianovich <ynvich@...il.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:REAL TIME CLOCK (RTC) SUBSYSTEM"
<rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] rtc: support DS1302 RTC on ICP DAS LP-8x4x
On Thu, 2015-12-24 at 12:04 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 22/12/2015 at 12:16:41 -0600, Rob Herring wrote :
> > Well, the binding should reflect that, whether the driver needs to
> > be
> > re-written is somewhat a separate question. That should probably
> > have
> > been done for the DS1302 driver originally and it is not too fair
> > for
> > the 2nd person to fix it. You could just have a single driver bound
> > to
> > the controller node which is aware of the DS1302 being the slave
> > device (ignoring that part of the DT for now).
> >
>
> I agree with Rob here. I won't require that you fix the driver but it
> would be better to have a proper DT binding from the beginning so that
> when the driver is fixed it will still work with the previous device
> trees.
No problem. I'll fix the driver. That's how it should be done.
What should be done with SECUREEDGE support?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists