linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] Documentation-getdelays: Fix a check for container file usage in main()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151224072210.15d6ee6c@lwn.net>
Date:	Thu, 24 Dec 2015 07:22:10 -0700
From:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Documentation-getdelays: Fix a check for container
 file usage in main()

On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:34:20 +0100
SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> The close() function could be called by the main() function even if
> the passed variable "cfd" was assigned a negative value.
> 
> * Corresponding implementation details could be improved by adjustments
>   for jump targets according to the Linux coding style convention.
> 
> * Fix the affected condition check.

This seems more easily fixed by simply making the condition > 0.
Meanwhile, I'd really not add labels-inside-if-statements as an example
in the documentation tree.

Thanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/