linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.2 70/77] net: add validation for the socket syscall protocol argument

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1450971462.558056231@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 24 Dec 2015 15:37:42 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	"Hannes Frederic Sowa" <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	"Cong Wang" <cwang@...pensource.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"郭永刚" <guoyonggang@....cn>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 70/77] net: add validation for the socket syscall
 protocol  argument

3.2.75-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>

[ Upstream commit 79462ad02e861803b3840cc782248c7359451cd9 ]

郭永刚 reported that one could simply crash the kernel as root by
using a simple program:

	int socket_fd;
	struct sockaddr_in addr;
	addr.sin_port = 0;
	addr.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY;
	addr.sin_family = 10;

	socket_fd = socket(10,3,0x40000000);
	connect(socket_fd , &addr,16);

AF_INET, AF_INET6 sockets actually only support 8-bit protocol
identifiers. inet_sock's skc_protocol field thus is sized accordingly,
thus larger protocol identifiers simply cut off the higher bits and
store a zero in the protocol fields.

This could lead to e.g. NULL function pointer because as a result of
the cut off inet_num is zero and we call down to inet_autobind, which
is NULL for raw sockets.

kernel: Call Trace:
kernel:  [<ffffffff816db90e>] ? inet_autobind+0x2e/0x70
kernel:  [<ffffffff816db9a4>] inet_dgram_connect+0x54/0x80
kernel:  [<ffffffff81645069>] SYSC_connect+0xd9/0x110
kernel:  [<ffffffff810ac51b>] ? ptrace_notify+0x5b/0x80
kernel:  [<ffffffff810236d8>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase2+0x108/0x200
kernel:  [<ffffffff81645e0e>] SyS_connect+0xe/0x10
kernel:  [<ffffffff81779515>] tracesys_phase2+0x84/0x89

I found no particular commit which introduced this problem.

CVE: CVE-2015-8543
Cc: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Reported-by: 郭永刚 <guoyonggang@....cn>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: open-code U8_MAX]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 include/net/sock.h     | 1 +
 net/ax25/af_ax25.c     | 3 +++
 net/decnet/af_decnet.c | 3 +++
 net/ipv4/af_inet.c     | 3 +++
 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c    | 3 +++
 net/irda/af_irda.c     | 3 +++
 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+)

--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ struct sock {
 				sk_no_check  : 2,
 				sk_userlocks : 4,
 				sk_protocol  : 8,
+#define SK_PROTOCOL_MAX ((u8)~0U)
 				sk_type      : 16;
 	kmemcheck_bitfield_end(flags);
 	int			sk_wmem_queued;
--- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
+++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
@@ -806,6 +806,9 @@ static int ax25_create(struct net *net,
 	struct sock *sk;
 	ax25_cb *ax25;
 
+	if (protocol < 0 || protocol > SK_PROTOCOL_MAX)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (!net_eq(net, &init_net))
 		return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
 
--- a/net/decnet/af_decnet.c
+++ b/net/decnet/af_decnet.c
@@ -681,6 +681,9 @@ static int dn_create(struct net *net, st
 {
 	struct sock *sk;
 
+	if (protocol < 0 || protocol > SK_PROTOCOL_MAX)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (!net_eq(net, &init_net))
 		return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
 
--- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
@@ -279,6 +279,9 @@ static int inet_create(struct net *net,
 	int try_loading_module = 0;
 	int err;
 
+	if (protocol < 0 || protocol >= IPPROTO_MAX)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (unlikely(!inet_ehash_secret))
 		if (sock->type != SOCK_RAW && sock->type != SOCK_DGRAM)
 			build_ehash_secret();
--- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
@@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ static int inet6_create(struct net *net,
 	int try_loading_module = 0;
 	int err;
 
+	if (protocol < 0 || protocol >= IPPROTO_MAX)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (sock->type != SOCK_RAW &&
 	    sock->type != SOCK_DGRAM &&
 	    !inet_ehash_secret)
--- a/net/irda/af_irda.c
+++ b/net/irda/af_irda.c
@@ -1106,6 +1106,9 @@ static int irda_create(struct net *net,
 
 	IRDA_DEBUG(2, "%s()\n", __func__);
 
+	if (protocol < 0 || protocol > SK_PROTOCOL_MAX)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (net != &init_net)
 		return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/