linux-kernel - Re: Documentation-getdelays: Less function calls in usage()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <567C4A30.8040500@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Thu, 24 Dec 2015 20:40:32 +0100
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: Documentation-getdelays: Less function calls in usage()

>> A single call of the fprintf() function is sufficient for the desired
>> display of the usage information.
> 
> This seems like churn that doesn't actually fix anything.

Will it matter occasionally to reduce the number of function calls
by combining several text fragments into the passing of one longer
string parameter?

Does a warning like "quoted string split across lines" need also
any further considerations for the Linux coding style specification?
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/scripts/checkpatch.pl?id=80c75a0f1d81922bf322c0634d1e1a15825a89e6#n4837

Regards,
Markus

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/