linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] hisilicon/dts: Add hi655x pmic dts node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <567B5BDF.2000304@hisilicon.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:43:43 +0800
From:	chenfeng <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	<lee.jones@...aro.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>,
	<mark.rutland@....com>, <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	<galak@...eaurora.org>, <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
	<puck.chen@...yun.com>, <yudongbin@...ilicon.com>,
	<saberlily.xia@...ilicon.com>, <suzhuangluan@...ilicon.com>,
	<kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>, <xuyiping@...ilicon.com>,
	<z.liuxinliang@...ilicon.com>, <weidong2@...ilicon.com>,
	<w.f@...wei.com>, <qijiwen@...ilicon.com>,
	<peter.panshilin@...ilicon.com>, <dan.zhao@...ilicon.com>,
	<linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] hisilicon/dts: Add hi655x pmic dts node



On 2015/12/23 8:46, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:20:16PM +0800, chenfeng wrote:
> 
> Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something
> substantially less than 80 columns.  Doing this makes your messages much
> easier to read and reply to.
> 
ok, thanks for your advice.
>> While doing this in driver code, I found that it seems all the vendor
>> chip have the voltage table. So I am wondering can we add this into
>> the regulator framework.
> 
>> We can add in the function of_get_regulation_constraints to get the
>> vset table.
> 
>> I am not sure this is right or not.
> 
> I'm just not convinced it's a good pattern to move this data out to DT,
> like I said in my other mail it's making the ABI bigger and I'm not sure
> I see much upside over putting the data in a table in DT rather than in
> C code.  It's more parsing code and more things we really shouldn't
> change in future.
> 
ok. I will send the new version soon.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/