[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5681203F.1010907@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:12:55 +0530
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>, <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: <marc.zyngier@....com>, <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/20] ARC: IRQ: use device tree to get timer device
configuration
On Sunday 27 December 2015 06:53 PM, Noam Camus wrote:
> From: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
>
> We've designated:
> TIMER0 for events (clockevents)
> TIMER1 for free running (clocksource)
>
> Till now timer configuration was done on arch/arc/kernel/time.c
> with constant values.
>
> This commit add device tree support so we can do this work
> at dedicated clocksource driver which parse the DT blob.
>
> Such driver will get clocksource rate as well as interrupt line
> from DT and use them for setting clocksourcse and clockevents.
>
> Note that lately called of_clk_init() is moved before we call
> clocksource_probe() since at that time device from DT
> need a "provider" (clocks) which will be available only after
> we call to of_clk_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
> Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
For patches which change semantically, ACK should not be copied over from prev
version. I do have some reservation with this patch.
I think we should just fix ARC once and for all by removing the legacy
registration. This would be a flag day change but I think we should be fine !
No point in keeping 2 implementations !
@Noam let me take a stab at it - OK !
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists