[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201512281528.48097@pali>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 15:28:48 +0100
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Add support for slot-name property in DT
On Monday 28 December 2015 15:14:50 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 25 December 2015 13:53:11 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 18 May 2015 17:07:57 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Monday 18 May 2015 08:06:07 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> [150515 14:26]:
> > > > > On Friday 15 May 2015 23:22:37 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > If setting up the generic binding is expected to take a while,
> > > > you can naturally pass it in pdata while waiting for the
> > > > generic binding to get merged.
> > >
> > > Yes, good idea. So the n900 machine can use auxdata to pass this
> > > for the time being, while the binding and generic implementation
> > > is being worked out.
> >
> > Ok, so what is needed to finish this patch series?
>
> I don't know where we are at this point. Has either the auxdata
> approach or the generic binding been worked on at all?
What are auxdata data? And what do you mean with "generic binding"
approach?
> If not, please try to get the auxdata variant to work, it should not
> be hard at all because there is no dependency on a generic binding.
>
> Arnd
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists