linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND v4 0/6] remoteproc: Add driver for STMicroelectronics platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJAp7OgZwf-Cd+Drypqo92YNJBYtB-XCbW-noy-4BB5JZojRnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Dec 2015 10:41:37 -0800
From:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>
To:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
	linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel@...inux.com, Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Nathan Lynch <Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, ludovic.barre@...com,
	"Anna, Suman" <s-anna@...com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND v4 0/6] remoteproc: Add driver for STMicroelectronics platforms

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> > ST's platforms often have multiple co-processors (usually ST40s or ST231s)
>>> > on-board.  This provides the Linux-side infrastructure to flash and boot
>>> > them successfully.
>>> >
>>> > This set has been tested on an STiH410-B2120.
>>>
>>> It would be nice if you could get at least one Reviewed-by tag coming
>>> outside of ST (e.g., Suman or Bjorn who are actively using and
>>> improving remoteproc).
>>
>> If you require reviews by these guys, shouldn't they be Maintainers?
>
> Additional review isn't a requirement, but it's a plus.
>
>> Please be aware that
>> the DTS(I) changes are applied to this set for your information only
>> and are not to be applied through the RemoteProc tree.  The usual
>> process to which we conform is that Maxime (the STi Maintainer) will
>> apply the DT changes *after* the main driver has been applied, in this
>> case by you.
>
> Ok, great, so I will not take patches 5 and 6.
>

I interpreted this as you picked patch 1-4 and didn't pay more
attention to them, but I can't find them in your kernel.org trees. So
I've looked through them again.

Please apply patch 1, 3 and 4 to your tree Ohad. I was unable to find
a v5 of patch 2, but it's unrelated so no need to wait for a new
version of that.

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/