linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] null_blk: don't enable irqs when in irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Dec 2015 13:08:41 -0700
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
To:	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] null_blk: don't enable irqs when in irq

On 12/28/2015 12:51 PM, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 12:11:17PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 12/28/2015 12:07 PM, Rabin Vincent wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:52:24AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> Something like this should work, can you test it?
>>>
>>> Spits out a bunch of the following.  It's this assertion:
>>>
>>> static inline void queue_lockdep_assert_held(struct request_queue *q)
>>> {
>>> 	if (q->queue_lock)
>>> 		lockdep_assert_held(q->queue_lock);
>>> }
>>
>> Ah right, we clear the stopped flag. This one should be better.
>
> Yes, this one appears to work fine.
>
>   Tested-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>

Thanks for testing, I've added it.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/