linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/AER: enable SERR# forwarding for bridges and switches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151228222927.GA15808@localhost>
Date:	Mon, 28 Dec 2015 16:29:28 -0600
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:	Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
	cov@...eaurora.org, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, jcm@...hat.com,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/AER: enable SERR# forwarding for bridges and
 switches

Hi Sinan,

Sorry for the delay in responding; I was on vacation when you sent
this, and I missed it when I returned.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 01:22:39PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/11/2015 6:30 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >> I think the best way to fix all the cases would be to do something in
> >> > in pci_configure_device().  Then we could drop the AER bus walk in
> >> > set_downstream_devices_error_reporting().  A bus walk like that is
> >> > always an issue for hotplug.
> >> > 
> > Let me read some code.
> 
> OK, If I understand it right; pci_configure_device is where
> program_hpp_type0 called. You also want to enable AER in this function.
> 
> Move the contents of set_device_error_reporting into
> pci_configure_device like this below ?
> 
> ...
> + int type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
> 
> pci_configure_mps(dev);
> 
> +	if ((type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) ||
> +	    (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) ||
> +	    (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM)) {
> +		pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(dev);
> +	}
> 
> +	pcie_set_ecrc_checking(dev);

Yep, that's the sort of thing I'm thinking.

I think there are some subtleties to consider.

_HPP/_HPX can twiddle some of the same bits.  Should we allow _HPP to
clear a bit that pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() would set?  What
about the reverse?

There are a ridiculous number of places that call
pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ERR).  We should
do it once and cache the result in struct pci_dev.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/