lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87twn32v0p.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:59:18 +0800
From:	kernel test robot <ying.huang@...ux.intel.com>
TO:	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
CC:	Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
Subject: [lkp] [selinux] 5d226df4ed: -10.1% unixbench.score

FYI, we noticed the below changes on

git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux stable-4.5
commit 5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac2741cf261ff7cbf1 ("selinux: Revalidate invalid inode security labels")


=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
  gcc-4.9/performance/x86_64-rhel/1/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/ivb42/pipe/unixbench

commit: 
  6f3be9f562e3027c77bc4482ccf2cea8600a7f74
  5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac2741cf261ff7cbf1

6f3be9f562e3027c 5d226df4edfa0eb1e689e7ac27 
---------------- -------------------------- 
         %stddev     %change         %stddev
             \          |                \  
      2086 ±  0%     -10.1%       1876 ±  0%  unixbench.score
      7.79 ±  0%     -10.2%       7.00 ±  1%  time.user_time
     33404 ±117%   +9470.5%    3196941 ±173%  latency_stats.max.wait_on_page_bit.__filemap_fdatawait_range.filemap_fdatawait_keep_errors.sync_inodes_sb.sync_inodes_one_sb.iterate_supers.sys_sync.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
     18934 ± 34%     -82.8%       3252 ± 73%  latency_stats.sum.rpc_wait_bit_killable.__rpc_execute.rpc_execute.rpc_run_task.nfs4_call_sync_sequence.[nfsv4]._nfs4_proc_access.[nfsv4].nfs4_proc_access.[nfsv4].nfs_do_access.nfs_permission.__inode_permission.inode_permission.link_path_walk
     57519 ±100%   +5478.5%    3208706 ±172%  latency_stats.sum.wait_on_page_bit.__filemap_fdatawait_range.filemap_fdatawait_keep_errors.sync_inodes_sb.sync_inodes_one_sb.iterate_supers.sys_sync.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
     13414 ± 33%     +49.4%      20036 ±  8%  numa-meminfo.node0.Active(anon)
     13399 ± 33%     +49.0%      19963 ±  7%  numa-meminfo.node0.AnonPages
     11624 ± 38%     -52.7%       5495 ± 18%  numa-meminfo.node1.Active(anon)
     11518 ± 38%     -52.6%       5457 ± 17%  numa-meminfo.node1.AnonPages
      1641 ± 50%     -53.8%     757.75 ± 15%  numa-meminfo.node1.PageTables
      3353 ± 33%     +49.2%       5004 ±  8%  numa-vmstat.node0.nr_active_anon
      3349 ± 33%     +49.0%       4991 ±  7%  numa-vmstat.node0.nr_anon_pages
      2904 ± 38%     -52.7%       1374 ± 18%  numa-vmstat.node1.nr_active_anon
      2878 ± 38%     -52.6%       1365 ± 17%  numa-vmstat.node1.nr_anon_pages
    410.00 ± 50%     -53.9%     189.00 ± 15%  numa-vmstat.node1.nr_page_table_pages
     14760 ±  2%    +207.2%      45336 ± 65%  numa-vmstat.node1.numa_other


ivb42: Ivytown Ivy Bridge-EP
Memory: 64G



                                  unixbench.score

  2150 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
       |                                                                    |
  2100 ++              .*..*.*..                                            |
       |          .*..*         *.*..*.                   .*.*..*.*         |
       *.*..*.*..*                     *..*.*.*..*.*..*.*.                  |
  2050 ++                                                                   |
       |                                                                    |
  2000 ++                                                                   |
       |                                                                    |
  1950 ++                                                                   |
       |                                                                    |
       O O  O O  O      O    O  O O  O O  O O O                             |
  1900 ++          O  O    O                     O O  O O  O O  O O         |
       |                                                             O O  O O
  1850 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+


	[*] bisect-good sample
	[O] bisect-bad  sample

To reproduce:

        git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
        cd lkp-tests
        bin/lkp install job.yaml  # job file is attached in this email
        bin/lkp run     job.yaml


Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.


Thanks,
Ying Huang

View attachment "job.yaml" of type "text/plain" (3202 bytes)

Download attachment "reproduce.sh" of type "application/x-sh" (4538 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ