lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5682544C.1030307@lightnvm.io>
Date:	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:37:16 +0100
From:	Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io>
To:	Wenwei Tao <ww.tao0320@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lightnvm: put block back to gc list on its reclaim fail

On 12/29/2015 09:27 AM, Wenwei Tao wrote:
> We delete a block from the gc list before reclaim it, so
> put it back to the list on its reclaim fail, otherwize
> this block will not get reclaimed and be programable
> in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenwei Tao <ww.tao0320@...il.com>
> ---
>   drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.c b/drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.c
> index d40c140..67b14d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.c
> @@ -379,16 +379,26 @@ static void rrpc_block_gc(struct work_struct *work)
>   	struct rrpc *rrpc = gcb->rrpc;
>   	struct rrpc_block *rblk = gcb->rblk;
>   	struct nvm_dev *dev = rrpc->dev;
> +	struct nvm_lun *lun = rblk->parent->lun;
> +	struct rrpc_lun *rlun = &rrpc->luns[lun->id - rrpc->lun_offset];
>
> +	mempool_free(gcb, rrpc->gcb_pool);
>   	pr_debug("nvm: block '%lu' being reclaimed\n", rblk->parent->id);
>
>   	if (rrpc_move_valid_pages(rrpc, rblk))
> -		goto done;
> +		goto put_back;
> +
> +	if (nvm_erase_blk(dev, rblk->parent))
> +		goto put_back;
>
> -	nvm_erase_blk(dev, rblk->parent);
>   	rrpc_put_blk(rrpc, rblk);
> -done:
> -	mempool_free(gcb, rrpc->gcb_pool);
> +
> +	return;
> +
> +put_back:
> +	spin_lock(&rlun->lock);
> +	list_add_tail(&rblk->prio, &rlun->prio_list);
> +	spin_unlock(&rlun->lock);
>   }
>
>   /* the block with highest number of invalid pages, will be in the beginning
>
Thanks Tao. I've applied it for 4.5.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ