linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] device property: the secondary fwnode needs to depend on the primary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1451386623.30729.353.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:57:03 +0200
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] device property: the secondary fwnode needs to
 depend on the primary

On Tue, 2015-12-29 at 10:40 +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> 
> Found a bug from my code..
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
> > index 0b22c8a..6c04d18 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/property.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/property.c
> > @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ bool fwnode_property_present(struct
> > fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *propname)
> >  	bool ret;
> >  
> >  	ret = __fwnode_property_present(fwnode, propname);
> > -	if (ret == false && fwnode->secondary)
> > +	if (ret == false && fwnode && fwnode->secondary)
> >  		ret = __fwnode_property_present(fwnode->secondary, 
> > propname);
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> > @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_property_match_string);
> >  	int _ret_;							
> > 		\
> >  	_ret_ = FWNODE_PROP_READ(_fwnode_, _propname_, _type_,
> > _proptype_,		\
> >  				 _val_, _nval_);			
> > 		\
> > -	if (_ret_ == -EINVAL && _fwnode_->secondary)		
> > 			\
> > +	if (_ret_ == -EINVAL && fwnode && _fwnode_->secondary)	
> > 			\
> 
> This should be .._fwnode_ && _fwnode_->secondary)

Yeah, we compiled it correctly due to fwnode presents in all
occurrences of this macro.

I will fix and resend a new version.

> 
> >  		_ret_ = FWNODE_PROP_READ(_fwnode_->secondary,
> > _propname_, _type_,	\
> >  				_proptype_, _val_, _nval_);	
> > 			\
> >  	_ret_;							
> > 			\
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/