[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2936028.iA62kEhLnJ@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:02:33 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: cmetcalf@...hip.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, klimov.linux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] 32-bit ABI: introduce ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T config option
On Tuesday 29 December 2015 12:26:35 Yury Norov wrote:
> All new 32-bit architectures should have 64-bit off_t type, but existing
> architectures has 32-bit ones.
>
> To handle it, new config option is added to arch/Kconfig that defaults
> ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T to be disabled for non-64 bit architectures. All existing
> 32-bit architectures enable it explicitly here.
>
> New option affects force_o_largefile() behaviour. Namely, if off_t is
> 64-bits long, we have no reason to reject user to open big files.
>
> Note that even if architectures has only 64-bit off_t in the kernel
> (arc, c6x, h8300, hexagon, metag, nios2, openrisc, tile32 and unicore32),
> a libc may use 32-bit off_t, and therefore want to limit the file size
> to 4GB unless specified differently in the open flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Should we merge the two patches through my asm-generic tree now, or should
we keep them in the ilp32 series, any preferences?
I think either way works.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists