[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1557466.ZWCBjbTVg8@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:51:01 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Rongrong Zou <zourongrong@...il.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, lijianhua@...wei.com,
lixiancai@...wei.com, linuxarm@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, minyard@....org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] ARM64 LPC: LPC driver implementation
On Tuesday 29 December 2015 21:33:51 Rongrong Zou wrote:
> We only implement io cycles here, we hook the lpc_io_write_byte
> and lpc_io_read_byte to inb/outb. So the drivers(ipmi/uart) which access
> the legacy ISA I/O port need no modification.
>
> The low pin count specification is at
> http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/industry/lpc.htm
>
> Signed-off-by: Rongrong Zou <zourongrong@...il.com>
I'm slightly confused here: I thought this driver was hisilicon specific.
Is the MMIO register layout that is used in this hardware actually standardized
in a way that the driver also works for all other implementations?
> +
> +static struct lpc_dev *lpc_dev;
> +
> +int lpc_master_write(unsigned int slv_access_mode, unsigned int cycle_type,
> + unsigned int addr, unsigned char *buf, unsigned int len)
> +{
Please make all function definitions 'static' so we don't accidentally get
other users that bypass the proper interface.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists