linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/mem.c: Add /dev/ioports, supporting 16-bit and 32-bit ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+iXiiM+TrciHROfgTcN01mfGEYuUCvpNRU0Qqgrt56VdCcR8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 21:25:15 +0530
From:	Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, alex.williamson@...hat.com
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, josh@...htriplett.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com,
	Santosh Shukla <sshukla@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/mem.c: Add /dev/ioports, supporting 16-bit
 and 32-bit ports

mistakenly added wrong email-id of alex, looping his correct one.

On 29 December 2015 at 21:23, Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 29 December 2015 at 18:58, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 23 December 2015 17:04:40 Santosh Shukla wrote:
>>> On 23 December 2015 at 03:26, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>>> > On Tuesday 22 December 2015, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>>> >> }
>>> >>
>>> >> So I care for /dev/ioport types interface who could do more than byte
>>> >> data copy to/from user-space. I tested this patch with little
>>> >> modification and could able to run pmd driver for arm/arm64 case.
>>> >>
>>> >> Like to know how to address pci_io region mapping problem for
>>> >> arm/arm64, in-case /dev/ioports approach is not acceptable or else I
>>> >> can spent time on restructuring the patch?
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > For the use case you describe, can't you use the vfio framework to
>>> > access the PCI BARs?
>>> >
>>>
>>> I looked at file: drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c, func vfio_pci_map() and
>>> it look to me that it only maps ioresource_mem pci region, pasting
>>> code snap:
>>>
>>> if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, index) & IORESOURCE_MEM))
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> ....
>>>
>>> and I want to map ioresource_io pci region for arm platform in my
>>> use-case. Not sure vfio maps pci_iobar region?
>>
>> Mapping I/O BARs is not portable, notably it doesn't work on x86.
>>
>> You should be able access them using the read/write interface on
>> the vfio device.
>>
> Right, x86 doesn't care as iopl() could give userspace application
> direct access to ioports.
>
> Also, Alex in other dpdk thread [1] suggested someone to propose io
> bar mapping in vfio-pci, I guess in particular to non-x86 arch so I
> started working on it.
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-December/030852.html
>
>>         Arnd
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/