linux-kernel - Routable IRQs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <878u4dj9r7.fsf@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:11:08 -0600
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
Subject: Routable IRQs

Hi Thomas & Jason,

I'm dealing with an interesting situation which I'm wondering if Linux
already support for.

Basically, in some TI SoCs we have what's referred to as Programmable
Real-Time Unit SubSystem (PRUSS). That's essentially a really simple,
low latency, single cycle architecture which is pretty darn good for bit
banging peripherals (ETH, SPI, I2C, UART, etc). It's very predicatable
because every instruction takes 5ns and interrupts don't cause
exceptions, they just get registered.

Anyway, the interesting part is that PRUSS has 64 events (on current
incarnations at least) and PRUSS has 10 physical IRQ lines to the ARM
land. Each of these 64 events can be routed to any of these 10 IRQ
lines. This might not be very useful on UP (AM335x & AM437x) other than
the fact that soft-IP drivers running on Linux would need to guarantee
they are the ones who should handle the IRQ. However, on SMP (AM57xx) we
could have real tangible benefits by means of IRQ affinity, etc.

So, the question is, what is there in IRQ subsystem today for routable
IRQ support ?

If a Diagram helps here's a simple one. Note that I'm not showing
details on the PRUSS side, but that side can also map events pretty much
any way it wants.

 .--------------------.             .--------------------.
 |      HOST CPU      |             |       PRUSS        |
 |--------------------|             |--------------------|
 |                    |             |                    |
 |               irq0 |<-.----------|evt0                |
 |                    |  |          |                    |
 |               irq1 |  |  .-------|evt1                |
 |                    |  |  |       |                    |
 |               irq2 |  '----------|evt2                |
 |                    |     |       |                    |
 |               irq3 |     |       |                    |
 |                    |     |       |                    |
 |               irq4 |     |       | .                  |
 |                    |     |       |                    |
 |               irq5 |     |       | .                  |
 |                    |     |       |                    |
 |               irq6 |     |       | .                  |
 |                    |     |       |                    |
 |               irq7 |<----'       |                    |
 |                    |             |                    |
 |               irq8 |             |                    |
 |                    |             |                    |
 |               irq9 |<------------|evtN                |
 '--------------------'             '--------------------'

Given this setup, what I want to do, is let soft-IP drivers running on
linux rely on standard *request_*irq() calls and DTS descrition. But I'm
still considering how/if we should describe the routing itself or just
go round-robin (i.o.w. irq0 -> evt0, irq1 -> evt1, ..., irq9 -> evt9,
irq0 -> evt10, ...).

Thoughts ?

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (819 bytes)