[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VePLCAP8L3ve4F4745Nnes+kYa5QHHKQos4=0iHw0Ah0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:55:35 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>, jcm@...hat.com,
helgaas@...nel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 1/2] ACPI, PCI, irq: remove interrupt count restriction
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 12/30/2015 8:28 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> Yep, I meant not to use an additional variable.
>>
>>> > BTW, I suggest you spend some time around checkpatch for contributions. I could
>>> > have caught most of the issues you are generally concerned before submitting a patch.
>> Is it a question?
>
> It is a request not a question. I hate wasting your time and my time with things that I could
> have fixed before submitting a patch.
>
> I ran the checkpatch and it said I'm good to go. But, obviously I'm not.
Hmm… checkpatch.pl is just a small helper to fix style issues. Here is
just a common sense rule, or kind of Occam's razor: no need to have
more variables then needed if it doesn't improve something really
significantly.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists