| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <00e101d142cd$b53ce1d0$1fb6a570$@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 14:44:56 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
To: 'He YunLei' <heyunlei@...wei.com>,
'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: use atomic variable for
total_extent_tree
Hi Yunlei,
Thanks for your report, but the fix should be done in another patch. :)
Hi Jaegeuk,
We should add to init total_zombie_tree in ("f2fs: speed up shrinking
extent tree entries") as Yunlei reported.
Thanks,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: He YunLei [mailto:heyunlei@...wei.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 7:11 PM
> To: Jaegeuk Kim
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: use atomic variable for total_extent_tree
>
> On 2015/12/22 11:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > It would be better to use atomic variable for total_extent_tree.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/debug.c | 5 +++--
> > fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 8 ++++----
> > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
> > fs/f2fs/node.c | 3 ++-
> > fs/f2fs/shrinker.c | 3 ++-
> > 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/debug.c b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> > index bb307e6..ed5dfcc 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static void update_general_status(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > si->hit_rbtree = atomic64_read(&sbi->read_hit_rbtree);
> > si->hit_total = si->hit_largest + si->hit_cached + si->hit_rbtree;
> > si->total_ext = atomic64_read(&sbi->total_hit_ext);
> > - si->ext_tree = sbi->total_ext_tree;
> > + si->ext_tree = atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> > si->ext_node = atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node);
> > si->ndirty_node = get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
> > si->ndirty_dent = get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS);
> > @@ -193,7 +193,8 @@ get_cache:
> > si->cache_mem += si->inmem_pages * sizeof(struct inmem_pages);
> > for (i = 0; i <= UPDATE_INO; i++)
> > si->cache_mem += sbi->im[i].ino_num * sizeof(struct ino_entry);
> > - si->cache_mem += sbi->total_ext_tree * sizeof(struct extent_tree);
> > + si->cache_mem += atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_tree) *
> > + sizeof(struct extent_tree);
> > si->cache_mem += atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node) *
> > sizeof(struct extent_node);
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> > index e86e9f1e..0e97d6af 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static struct extent_tree *__grab_extent_tree(struct inode *inode)
> > rwlock_init(&et->lock);
> > atomic_set(&et->refcount, 0);
> > et->count = 0;
> > - sbi->total_ext_tree++;
> > + atomic_inc(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> > }
> > atomic_inc(&et->refcount);
> > up_write(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
> > @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int
> nr_shrink)
> >
> > radix_tree_delete(root, et->ino);
> > kmem_cache_free(extent_tree_slab, et);
> > - sbi->total_ext_tree--;
> > + atomic_dec(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> > tree_cnt++;
> >
> > if (node_cnt + tree_cnt >= nr_shrink)
> > @@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ void f2fs_destroy_extent_tree(struct inode *inode)
> > f2fs_bug_on(sbi, atomic_read(&et->refcount) || et->count);
> > radix_tree_delete(&sbi->extent_tree_root, inode->i_ino);
> > kmem_cache_free(extent_tree_slab, et);
> > - sbi->total_ext_tree--;
> > + atomic_dec(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> > up_write(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
> >
> > F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree = NULL;
> > @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ void init_extent_cache_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > init_rwsem(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sbi->extent_list);
> > spin_lock_init(&sbi->extent_lock);
> > - sbi->total_ext_tree = 0;
> > + atomic_set(&sbi->total_ext_tree, 0);
> Hi,
> here we'd better to init total_zombie_tree:
> atomic_set(&sbi->total_zombie_tree, 0);
> Thanks,
> > atomic_set(&sbi->total_ext_node, 0);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index 19beabe..a7f6191 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
> > struct rw_semaphore extent_tree_lock; /* locking extent radix tree */
> > struct list_head extent_list; /* lru list for shrinker */
> > spinlock_t extent_lock; /* locking extent lru list */
> > - int total_ext_tree; /* extent tree count */
> > + atomic_t total_ext_tree; /* extent tree count */
> > atomic_t total_ext_node; /* extent info count */
> >
> > /* basic filesystem units */
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > index d842b19..6cc8ac7 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > @@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ bool available_free_memory(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
> > sizeof(struct ino_entry)) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> > res = mem_size < ((avail_ram * nm_i->ram_thresh / 100) >> 1);
> > } else if (type == EXTENT_CACHE) {
> > - mem_size = (sbi->total_ext_tree * sizeof(struct extent_tree) +
> > + mem_size = (atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_tree) *
> > + sizeof(struct extent_tree) +
> > atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node) *
> > sizeof(struct extent_node)) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> > res = mem_size < ((avail_ram * nm_i->ram_thresh / 100) >> 1);
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c b/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> > index da0d8e0..a11e099 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
> > @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ static unsigned long __count_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >
> > static unsigned long __count_extent_cache(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > {
> > - return sbi->total_ext_tree + atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node);
> > + return atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_tree) +
> > + atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node);
> > }
> >
> > unsigned long f2fs_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists