linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/3] clocksource/vt8500: Use MIN_OSCR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1512312331580.28591@nanos>
Date:	Thu, 31 Dec 2015 23:33:45 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Roman Volkov <v1ron@...l.ru>
cc:	arm@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>,
	Roman Volkov <rvolkov@...os.org>,
	Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/3] clocksource/vt8500: Use MIN_OSCR_DELTA
 from PXA

Roman,

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Roman Volkov wrote:
> Since vt8500 and PXA timers are identical, use MIN_OSCR_DELTA from PXA,
> which is bigger than existing value. It is required to determine the
> minimum delay which hardware can generate.

Now that brings up the obvious question:

If the vt8500 and PXA timers are identical why has vt8500 it's own slightly
different implementation and does not use the PXA timer?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/