lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151230211544.32bc337e@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:15:44 -0500
From:	Sanidhya Solanki <jpage.lkml@...il.com>
To:	David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Cc:	clm@...com, jbacik@...com, dsterba@...e.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BTRFS: Runs the xor function if a Block has failed

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:18:26 +0100
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz> wrote:

> That's just the comment copied, the changelog does not explain why
> it's ok to do just the run_xor there. It does not seem trivial to me.
> Please describe that the end result after the code change is expected.

In the RAID 6 case after a failure, we discover that the failure
affected the entire P stripe, without any bad data occurring. Hence, we
xor the previously stored parity data to return the data that was lost
in the P stripe failure.

The xor-red data is from the parity blocks. Hence, we are left with 
recovered data belonging to the P stripe.

If there is an error during the completion of the xor (provided by the
patch ), we got to the cleanup function.

Hope that is satisfactory.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ