[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151230211544.32bc337e@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:15:44 -0500
From: Sanidhya Solanki <jpage.lkml@...il.com>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Cc: clm@...com, jbacik@...com, dsterba@...e.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BTRFS: Runs the xor function if a Block has failed
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:18:26 +0100
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz> wrote:
> That's just the comment copied, the changelog does not explain why
> it's ok to do just the run_xor there. It does not seem trivial to me.
> Please describe that the end result after the code change is expected.
In the RAID 6 case after a failure, we discover that the failure
affected the entire P stripe, without any bad data occurring. Hence, we
xor the previously stored parity data to return the data that was lost
in the P stripe failure.
The xor-red data is from the parity blocks. Hence, we are left with
recovered data belonging to the P stripe.
If there is an error during the completion of the xor (provided by the
patch ), we got to the cleanup function.
Hope that is satisfactory.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists