lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 31 Dec 2015 16:50:54 +0900
From:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Subject: [Question about DMA] Consistent memory?

Hi.

I am new to the Linux DMA APIs.

First, I started by reading Documentation/DMA-API.txt,
but I am confused with the term "consistent memory".

Please help me understand the document correctly.


The DMA-API.txt says as follows:

----------------------->8--------------------------------------------
void *
dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
    dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flag)

Consistent memory is memory for which a write by either the device or
the processor can immediately be read by the processor or device
without having to worry about caching effects.  (You may however need
to make sure to flush the processor's write buffers before telling
devices to read that memory.)
------------------------8<--------------------------------------------


As far as I understand the the cited sentence, for the memory
to be consistent, DMA controllers must be connected to
DRAM through some special hardware that keeps the memory
coherency, such as SCU.  I assume the system like Fig.1


Fig.1

|------|  |------| |-----|
| CPU0 |  | CPU1 | | DMA |
|------|  |------| |-----|
   |         |        |
   |         |        |
|------|  |------| |-----|
| L1-C |  | L1-C | | ACP |
|------|  |------| |-----|
   |         |        |
|------------------------|
|    Snoop Control Unit  |
|------------------------|
             |
|------------------------|
|         L2-cache       |
|------------------------|
             |
|------------------------|
|           DRAM         |
|------------------------|

(ACP = accelerator coherency port)



But, I think such a system is rare.

At least on my SoC (ARM SoC), DMA controllers
for NAND, MMC, etc. are directly connected to the DRAM
like Fig.2.

So, cache operations must be explicitly done
by software before/after DMAs are kicked.
(I think this is very normal.)

Fig.2

|------|  |------| |-----|
| CPU0 |  | CPU1 | | DMA |
|------|  |------| |-----|
   |         |        |
   |         |        |
|------|  |------|    |
| L1-C |  | L1-C |    |
|------|  |------|    |
   |         |        |
|------------------|  |
|Snoop Control Unit|  |
|------------------|  |
         |            |
|------------------|  |
|   L2-cache       |  |
|------------------|  |
         |            |
|--------------------------|
|           DRAM           |
|--------------------------|


In a system like Fig.2, is the memory non-consistent?

As long as I read DMA-API.txt, it is non-consistent.
There is no consistent memory on my SoC.

But, not only dma_alloc_noncoherent, but also dma_alloc_coherent()
returns a memory region on my SoC.  I am confused...



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists