[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5684E6A1.8050204@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:26:09 +0100
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: Clear the vldclr if state
machine is stay on FSM_VLDCLR state.
On 31/12/15 03:09, Henry Chen wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Wed, 2015-12-30 at 19:02 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 22/12/15 08:51, Henry Chen wrote:
>>> Sometimes PMIC is too busy to send data in time to cause pmic wrap timeout,
>>> because pmic wrap is waiting for FSM_VLDCLR after finishing WACS2_CMD. It
>>> just return error when issue happened, so the state machine will stay on
>>> FSM_VLDCLR state when data send back later by PMIC and timeout again in next
>>> time because pmic wrap waiting for FSM_IDLE state at the begining of the
>>> read/write function.
>>>
>>> Clear the vldclr when timeout if state machine is stay on FSM_VLDCLR.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>>> index 105597a..ccd5337 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>>> @@ -443,10 +443,16 @@ static int pwrap_wait_for_state(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp,
>>> static int pwrap_write(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata)
>>> {
>>> int ret;
>>> + u32 val;
>>>
>>> ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + /* Clear vldclr bit if state is on the WACS_FSM_WFVLDCLR */
>>> + val = pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA);
>>> + if (PWRAP_GET_WACS_FSM(val) == PWRAP_WACS_FSM_WFVLDCLR)
>>> + pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR);
>>> return ret;
>>> + }
>>
>> I would prefer to have this encapsulated in a (inline) function. Maybe
>> with better description then just the one line comment.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matthias
>
> Ok, I will make the description more clear, do you means write the
> function like below and used it on pwrap_write/pwrap_read.
>
> static inline void pwrap_leave_fsm_vldclr(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
> {
> if (pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr(wrp))
> pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR);
> }
>
I didn't remind of pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr neither, nice.
Yes please use this function and add a descriptive comment on the top,
so that in the future it is clear what is happening here.
Thanks,
Matthias
>
> Thanks,
> Henry
>
>>
>>>
>>> pwrap_writel(wrp, (1 << 31) | ((adr >> 1) << 16) | wdata,
>>> PWRAP_WACS2_CMD);
>>> @@ -457,10 +463,16 @@ static int pwrap_write(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata)
>>> static int pwrap_read(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata)
>>> {
>>> int ret;
>>> + u32 val;
>>>
>>> ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + /* Clear vldclr bit if state is on the WACS_FSM_WFVLDCLR */
>>> + val = pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA);
>>> + if (PWRAP_GET_WACS_FSM(val) == PWRAP_WACS_FSM_WFVLDCLR)
>>> + pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR);
>>> return ret;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> pwrap_writel(wrp, (adr >> 1) << 16, PWRAP_WACS2_CMD);
>>>
>>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists