[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 02:13:07 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net-iwlegacy: One check less in il_eeprom_init()
after error detection
Hello.
On 1/1/2016 11:31 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 21:12:29 +0100
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Adjust a jump target to avoid a check repetition before the function
> call "il_eeprom_free".
One question: why?
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c
> index c3afaf7..ae45fd3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/common.c
[...]
> @@ -772,9 +772,11 @@ il_eeprom_init(struct il_priv *il)
> done:
> il->ops->eeprom_release_semaphore(il);
>
> -err:
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> +free_eeprom:
This is ugly, I'd say.
[...]
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists