linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] NFC-mei_phy: Refactoring for mei_nfc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGRGNgWiHKLrHMUySnCpfiF1+C=QV-i4C4KNmziga3-E1CLfKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 3 Jan 2016 10:41:22 +1100
From:	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
To:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@...nbossa.org>,
	Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@...nbossa.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] NFC-mei_phy: Refactoring for mei_nfc_connect()

Hi Markus,

On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 7:54 AM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 21:21:24 +0100
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Adjust jump targets according to the current Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/nfc/mei_phy.c | 13 ++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/mei_phy.c b/drivers/nfc/mei_phy.c
> index 83deda4..8e3a69f 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/mei_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/mei_phy.c
> @@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ static int mei_nfc_connect(struct nfc_mei_phy *phy)
>
>         reply = kzalloc(connect_resp_length, GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!reply) {
> -               kfree(cmd);
> -               return -ENOMEM;
> +               r = -ENOMEM;
> +               goto free_cmd;
>         }
>
>         connect_resp = (struct mei_nfc_connect_resp *)reply->data;
> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static int mei_nfc_connect(struct nfc_mei_phy *phy)
>         r = mei_cldev_send(phy->cldev, (u8 *)cmd, connect_length);
>         if (r < 0) {
>                 pr_err("Could not send connect cmd %d\n", r);
> -               goto err;
> +               goto free_reply;
>         }
>
>         bytes_recv = mei_cldev_recv(phy->cldev, (u8 *)reply,
> @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static int mei_nfc_connect(struct nfc_mei_phy *phy)
>         if (bytes_recv < 0) {
>                 r = bytes_recv;
>                 pr_err("Could not read connect response %d\n", r);
> -               goto err;
> +               goto free_reply;
>         }
>
>         MEI_DUMP_NFC_HDR("connect reply", &reply->hdr);
> @@ -210,11 +210,10 @@ static int mei_nfc_connect(struct nfc_mei_phy *phy)
>                 connect_resp->me_hotfix, connect_resp->me_build);
>
>         r = 0;
> -
> -err:
> +free_reply:
>         kfree(reply);
> +free_cmd:
>         kfree(cmd);
> -

Why are you deleting the two blank lines here?

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@...il.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/