linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net-gianfar: Less function calls in gfar_ethflow_to_filer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160101.221623.1803086114442111105.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 01 Jan 2016 22:16:23 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, claudiu.manoil@...escale.com,
	julia.lawall@...6.fr, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net-gianfar: Less function calls in
 gfar_ethflow_to_filer_table() after error detection


This is not the proper way to resubmit patches when you are asked
to make changes to some portion of a multi-patch series.

You must always resubmit the entire series when this happens,
not just the patch that changes.

And in the revised cover "0/N" posting you list the revisions
that were made.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/