linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 0/2] WM8505/WM8650 DT fixes for SD card controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160102121239.01b64a0c@v1ron-s7>
Date:	Sat, 2 Jan 2016 12:12:39 +0300
From:	Roman Volkov <v1ron@...l.ru>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, linux+armsoc@....linux.org.uk,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, arm@...nel.org,
	Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>,
	Roman Volkov <rvolkov@...os.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 0/2] WM8505/WM8650 DT fixes for SD card
 controller

В Fri, 01 Jan 2016 22:53:33 +0100
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> пишет:

> On Friday 01 January 2016 20:32:30 Roman Volkov wrote:
> > > Applied both to next/dt, thanks a lot for following up!
> > > 
> > > Let me know if you think this should go into stable backports as
> > > well, I did not apply it to the fixes branch as you don't have a
> > > 'Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org' tag and it has never worked so far.  
> > 
> > Yes, this must go into the stable too. Let me know if I must change
> > something or resend.  
> 
> I can put them in the fixes branch with the appropriate stable
> tag myself, but please clarify whether we need just the first or
> both patches there. It looks to me that the second one while
> correct only addresses a cosmetic problem and everything works
> without it.

Correct, everything works without the second one. One of reviewers
noticed that addresses are different between WM8505 and WM8650 where
the hardware is the same. If such trivial changes are not accepted,
please do not apply.

Happy New Year,
Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/