[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5687B576.7020303@colorfullife.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 12:33:10 +0100
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
sds@...ho.nsa.gov, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, mhocko@...e.cz,
gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com, Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: GPF in shm_lock ipc
Hi Dmitry,
shm locking differs too much from msg/sem locking, I never looked at it
in depth, so I'm not able to perform a proper review.
Except for the obvious: Races that can be triggered from user space are
inacceptable.
Regardless if there is a BUG_ON, a WARN_ON or nothing at all.
On 12/21/2015 04:44 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> +
>> +/* This is called by fork, once for every shm attach. */
>> +static void shm_open(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> + int err = __shm_open(vma);
>> + /*
>> + * We raced in the idr lookup or with shm_destroy().
>> + * Either way, the ID is busted.
>> + */
>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(err);
>> }
Is it possible to trigger this race? Parallel IPC_RMID & fork()?
--
Manfred
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists