linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/8] rtc-ab-b5ze-s3: Delete an unnecessary variable in _abb5zes3_rtc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56895246.3080302@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Sun, 3 Jan 2016 17:54:30 +0100
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] rtc-ab-b5ze-s3: Delete an unnecessary variable in
 _abb5zes3_rtc_interrupt()

>> Pass the address of the data structure element "time" directly in calls
>> of the function "rtc_update_irq" instead of an extra initialisation
>> for one local variable at the beginning.
> 
> Why is it better?

I suggest to refer to the data item "rtc_data->rtc" directly because
the variable "rtc" was read only in two if branches.
Does it make sense then to reduce the variable allocation?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/