[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1451871440.2772.16.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 20:37:20 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Petko Manolov <petkan@...-labs.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the vfs tree
On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 15:24 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got a conflict in:
>
> security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 3bc8f29b149e ("new helper: memdup_user_nul()")
>
> from the vfs tree and commit:
>
> 38d859f991f3 ("IMA: policy can now be updated multiple times")
>
> from the security tree.
>
> I fixed it up (hopefully, see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> (no action is required).
Hi Stephen,
FYI, I pushed out Petko's patch to linux-integrity/next earlier today.
His patch moves taking the ima_write_mutex to after the the call to
copy_from_user(), as discussed. This obviously won't fix the conflict
with Al's patch. How do you want to handle it? Do I need to do
anything?
Thanks!
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists