[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160104124450.7ba21c87@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:44:50 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the nfsd tree
Hi all,
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:30:22 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in a quite a
> few files between (mostly, I think) commit:
>
> 6c7b6d2d442c ("IB: merge struct ib_device_attr into struct ib_device")
>
> from the nfsd tree and various commits from the rdma tree.
>
> It would have taken me considerable time to fix the conflicts up, so I
> have dropped teh rdma tree for today (just because it was merged second).
> Please have a conversation and figure out how you are going to cooperate
> and get these conflicts fixed e.g. set up a stable branch with Christoph's
> commit (and any other conflicting commits) in it and merge that into
> both trees.
So, on further inspection, it appears that there is a series of commits
in the rdma tree that does basically the same as that nfsd tree commit
above. So I have dropped the rdma tree again today. Please have a
conversation guys ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists