[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160104135221.0e5515ac@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:52:21 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Petko Manolov <petkan@...-labs.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the integrity tree with the vfs tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the integrity tree got a conflict in:
security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
between commit:
3bc8f29b149e ("new helper: memdup_user_nul()")
from the vfs tree and commit:
6427e6c71c8b ("ima: ima_write_policy() limit locking")
from the integrity tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
index a185b6f2f390,f355231997b4..000000000000
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
@@@ -277,13 -272,25 +272,20 @@@ static ssize_t ima_write_policy(struct
if (*ppos != 0)
goto out;
- result = -ENOMEM;
- data = kmalloc(datalen + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!data)
+ data = memdup_user_nul(buf, datalen);
+ if (IS_ERR(data)) {
+ result = PTR_ERR(data);
goto out;
-
- *(data + datalen) = '\0';
-
- result = -EFAULT;
- if (copy_from_user(data, buf, datalen))
- goto out_free;
+ }
+ result = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ima_write_mutex);
+ if (result < 0)
+ goto out_free;
result = ima_parse_add_rule(data);
+ mutex_unlock(&ima_write_mutex);
+
+ out_free:
+ kfree(data);
out:
if (result < 0)
valid_policy = 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists